Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415UA_M415UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415UA_M415UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415UA
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 05:24
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 262
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 638
71% 559 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1862) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 24.6
15% 19.7 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 19.1
15% 17.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 151 167 166 141 186 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 992
Write 143
Mixed 360
SusWrite 163
90% 415 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 39.7
137% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 453
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 151
162% 276 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 25.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 23.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415UA_M415UA Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415UA_M415UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback