Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2530 M6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY RX2530 M6  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3890-A1
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '23 at 08:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 192
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 769
67% 571 Pts
64-Core 2,237
138% 2,237 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
Nvidia(10DE 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.89
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.1% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 44.8
38% 48 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 47.4
39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FTS PRAID EP520i 959GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 769 773 766 770 771 771 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
170% Outstanding
Read 946
Write 780
Mixed 735
SusWrite 770
182% 808 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 53.8
176% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 603
466% 652 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40DB3-CWE 4x16GB
4 of 32 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 22.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 10.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 221%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY RX2530 M6 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX2530 M6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback