Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory53.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 00:57
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$445
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 231
2-Core 461
129% 255 Pts
4-Core 894
8-Core 1708
155% 1,301 Pts
64-Core 4,346
269% 4,346 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 120%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3959
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 256
Parallax 11.2
8% 92.3 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 10.9
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,991
Write 4,870
Mixed 3,265
836% 3,709 MB/s
4K Read 87.5
4K Write 357
4K Mixed 107
459% 184 MB/s
DQ Read 2,218
DQ Write 1,714
DQ Mixed 2,025
1,499% 1,986 MB/s
Poor: 279% Great: 611%
USB Flash Drive 32GB
25GB free, PID 5598
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 18.4
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.5
9% 9.13 MB/s
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.3
260% 2.55 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M4B6600C32 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 51.3
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 49
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 28.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 237%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 10,572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback