Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IC
Memory17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 14:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 195
58% 111 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 352
42% 325 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 11DC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 5
4% 24.9 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 532 546 689 791 797 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 885
Write 483
Mixed 772
SusWrite 647
156% 697 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 47.8
156% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 325
235% 307 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 137%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S16S682QMMM52-12 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback