Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 3.3 2-Core 5.1 2% 4.2 Pts	4-Core 7.9 8-Core 10.2 1% 9.05 Pts	64-Core 3 0% 3 Pts
Poor: 8% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 7,644 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3800) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.3 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0Q5E Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 156 Write 12.7 Mixed 53.3 55% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.3 MC Mixed 2.1 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.47 GB/s	Latency 606 7% 606 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 3,779 samples	7x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	6x
E2-6110 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 29%, 1,030 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	7x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	6x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 1,710 samples	1x

SSD
PSP240 SSD 240GBPalitBench 62%, 260 samples	2x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 26%, 6,848 samples	2x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	2x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16