Notebook W65_67SC

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Notebook W65_67SC (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook W65_67SC
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150820
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '23 at 01:19
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210M 15,981 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	53.9% Above average	Memory 77 1-Core 76.4 2-Core 132 58% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 212 25% 193 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Clevo(1558 6505) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9124 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 18 17% 18.7 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 15.3 14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SFAT128G1122 128GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2320000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 150 161 159 169 171 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 389 Write 145 Mixed 156 SusWrite 158 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 10.5 59% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 73.9 81% 135 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 69%
Kingbank KP330 120GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 48GB free Firmware: V2.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 68 74 75 77 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 361 Write 262 Mixed 244 SusWrite 97.2 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 7.4 40% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 0515 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.9% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 86.3 46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical W65_67SC Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SC

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel $48Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	18x
Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples	10x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	6x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	18x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	18x

SSD
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	4x
SD8SFAT128G1122 128GBSandiskBench 57%, 119 samples	3x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	2x

RAM
M2S4G64CC88B4N-DI 0420 6GBUnknownBench 44%, 8 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,963 samples	4x
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 0515 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GBUnknownBench 41%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $48

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16