Lenovo 80SM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80SM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5A2
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateApr 27 '23 at 16:07
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 133
51% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 173
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 920MX
Legend(17AA 3824) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3161
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 6.3
6% 8.13 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 7.8
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 65 24 49 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45% Average
Read 102
Write 115
Mixed 57
SusWrite 54.9
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45%
Great: 70%
WD Ext HDD 1021 750GB
351GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 34 35 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 50.6
Write 35.1
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 35
48% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SM Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback