Today's hottest deals

Dream NS5x_NS7xPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemDream NS5x_NS7xPU  (all builds)
MotherboardDream NS5x_NS7xPU
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220608
Uptime3 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 10:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1220P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 155
59% 104 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 245
28% 221 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 7716) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4311
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme BIWIN CE480T5D101-512 512GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0.M Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 329 344 314 357 365 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.1% Excellent
Read 364
Write 354
Mixed 334
SusWrite 336
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 30
105% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 174
158% 246 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ACPI Digital Co Ltd CMB6-DHDA1BAR08D00 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS5x_NS7xPU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dream NS5x_NS7xPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback