Lenovo 056849U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemLenovo 056849U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '23 at 20:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 157
58% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 492
48% 394 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 18.8
12% 17 fps
MRender 21.1
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 15.4
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 37 37 39 40 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 225
Write 45
Mixed 78
SusWrite 38.4
21% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 17.1
68% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 46.7
DQ Mixed 51.8
62% 114 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 102%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
865GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 111 108 110 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 80.7
Write 73.6
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 113
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ PSD34G160081 PSD34G160081 PUD31600C98G2 PUD31600C98G2 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 056849U Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 056849U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback