PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W510 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3067-A1 |
Memory | 3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150618 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | May 04 '23 at 21:11 |
Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 71% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31270
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 230 204 204 200 168 MB/s
|
62.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31220Intel $305Bench 68%, 2,507 samples | 12x |
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples | 11x |
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 9x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 7x |
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $560 |