HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82A2
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime9 Days
Run DateMay 04 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
67% 124 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 339
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82A2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6615
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.4
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-CE256-HP 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8C1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 213 218 189 192 210 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 330
Write 211
Mixed 217
SusWrite 198
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 15.5
58% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 158
135% 196 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G4 SFF Builds (Compare 735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G4 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback