Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '23 at 21:57
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 167
2-Core 320
98% 187 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 882
78% 663 Pts
64-Core 978
61% 978 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 86D2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.61
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 108
Parallax 112
95% 112 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 103
Splatting 94.2
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,832
Write 3,030
Mixed 2,864
651% 2,909 MB/s
4K Read 70.3
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 95.8
314% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,279
DQ Write 1,038
DQ Mixed 1,056
818% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 210% Great: 429%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
245GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 337
Write 294
Mixed 318
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 29.3
92% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 252
188% 249 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 23.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 21.8
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $637
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback