Lenovo 90F10000US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90F10000US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '23 at 08:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 167
56% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 289
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 30ED) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS9006B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 154 185 46 69 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 372
Write 120
Mixed 292
SusWrite 129
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 30.6
122% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 191
167% 246 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 0118 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 12.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90F10000US Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90F10000US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback