Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B92
Motherboard	MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds)
Memory	111.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190325
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	May 06 '23 at 13:51
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2970WX-$1,509 1,966 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 79.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 232 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 750 74% 602 Pts	64-Core 3,236 200% 3,236 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 929 User benchmarks, average bench 16% AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1201 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.Q1.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 24.1 Parallax 31.4 15% 24.7 fps	MRender 22.7 Gravity 24.8 Splatting 23.6 19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 1367 1374 1466 1638 1686 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 2,056 Write 1,719 Mixed 1,125 SusWrite 1,458 356% 1,590 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 39 125% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 531 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 387 293% 400 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 393%
Amd-raid Array 2 8TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 366% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 922 871 938 1020 925 568 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 907 Mixed 579 SusWrite 874 163% 718 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 22.8 71% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 461 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 347 266% 365 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 495%
Amd-raid Array 1 6TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 499GB free Firmware: 9.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 152 144 162 165 153 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 157 Write 160 Mixed 89 SusWrite 153 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 184% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 8x16GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.3% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 27.9 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 23.6 SC Mixed 23 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 178%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x

RAM
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 135%, 67 samples	3x

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,611

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16