Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170818
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 02:33
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 172
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 289
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 37.4
21% 30.2 fps
MRender 27.5
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 25.4
23% 28 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
644GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 72 120 101 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 135
Write 155
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 101
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
687GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 76 79 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 127
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 81.5
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
207% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback