Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '23 at 16:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 59
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
70% 131 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 479
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 282D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 11
Parallax 9.8
5% 9 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 795 852 847 870 863 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,100
Write 877
Mixed 815
SusWrite 829
203% 905 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 50.6
165% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 414
292% 374 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 162%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 27
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 22.5
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback