Today's hottest deals

HP 290 G4 Microtower PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 290 G4 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8948
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210807
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 10 '23 at 06:33
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$359
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 89.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 277
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 852
86% 696 Pts
64-Core 1,324
82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8948) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.6
6% 8.8 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 0.1
5% 7.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Twinmos SSD 512GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 118 252 211 18 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 501
Write 411
Mixed 300
SusWrite 122
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 0.9
42% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 71.3
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 0.9
12% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2724CS.001 Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 20.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 24.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 290 G4 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 290 G4 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $359
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback