Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200H 11,882 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 111 50% 81.7 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 159 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 1107) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2.2 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.5% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB 4,026 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 486 189 247 282 241 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 644GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 90 85 121 125 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 116 Write 113 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 109 65% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF MSI16D3LS1KFG/4G 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	295x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	86x
GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples	48x

SSD
HG6 mSATA 128GBToshibaBench 71%, 3,217 samples	24x
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	18x
HFS128G3AMNB-2200A 128GBBench 67%, 1,805 samples	16x

RAM
MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,484 samples	62x
AM1L16BC8R2-B1QS 1x8GBAdataBench 28%, 4,045 samples	28x
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 6,146 samples	23x