Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory12.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '23 at 16:03
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Memory 0.96
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 88.9
22% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 210
25% 193 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.44.10
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 2.3
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 164 43 83 92 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 517
Write 436
Mixed 411
SusWrite 79.5
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 10.2
36% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 190
131% 162 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Adata 20GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 5.6
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.1
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 497
8% 497 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_X512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback