Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba QOSMIO X70-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '15 at 09:49
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 486
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 5.75
3% 5.14 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.09
5% 5.85 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 261
Write 237
Mixed 254
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 30.3
88% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 118
106% 159 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61%
Great: 107%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167
225GB free
Firmware: HTTAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 420
Mixed 477
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 36.1
116% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 124
124% 201 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: KA0OA500 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 97.4
Mixed 91.8
69% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.16
63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 46.8
Mixed 45.8
61% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.21
62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 93.2
Mixed 65.1
106% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.16
57% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QOSMIO X70-A Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback