Samsung 955XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 955XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP955XED-KA1SE
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 53.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 236
68% 131 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 778
77% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1C5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 24.1
17% 24.2 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 20.2
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B 512GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7EK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1131 1067 803 1001 1005 1011 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,086
Write 849
Mixed 845
SusWrite 1,003
213% 946 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 34.5
129% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 593
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 443
320% 423 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 162%
Great: 413%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
125% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 48.6
146% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 125%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 955XED Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 955XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback