Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 233%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 02:00
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$235
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 207
2-Core 414
120% 234 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,355
133% 1,091 Pts
64-Core 2,385
148% 2,385 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 243
Parallax 309
220% 274 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 226
Splatting 166
184% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi3000 SSD 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 576 582 587 584 589 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,266
Write 1755
Mixed 1476
SusWrite 619
289% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 94.1
332% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,463
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1,314
972% 1,290 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 248%
Great: 248%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
449GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 286 286 280 293 279 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 447
Mixed 433
SusWrite 311
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 47.7
155% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 330
250% 336 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
954GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 1412 1323 1297 1288 1280 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 1,368
Mixed 1,032
SusWrite 1,305
284% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 84.5
294% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 272
342% 598 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 259%
Great: 255%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 172 173 173 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 125
Mixed 101
SusWrite 172
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 34.5
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 28
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z690 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $759
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback