Today's hottest deals

Dream NS5x_NS7xPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemDream NS5x_NS7xPU  (all builds)
MotherboardDream NS5x_NS7xPU
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220608
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateMay 16 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1220P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 313
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 742
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 7716) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 9.8
7% 8.97 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 8.5
8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme BIWIN CE480T5D101-512 512GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0.M Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 441 265 444 259 461 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 799
Mixed 400
SusWrite 370
117% 517 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 31.9
144% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 641
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 163
198% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN ACPI Digital Co Ltd CMB6-DGDA1BAR08D00 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 35.7
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 24.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS5x_NS7xPU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dream NS5x_NS7xPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback