Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10DAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemSupermicro X10DAx  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAX
Memory118 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200204
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMay 18 '23 at 21:53
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 190
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 748
65% 555 Pts
64-Core 3,331
206% 3,331 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 174
Parallax 177
141% 175 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 151
Splatting 127
125% 156 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1883 509 269 184 160 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,440
Write 1,993
Mixed 1,640
SusWrite 544
317% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 56.7
183% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 607
DQ Mixed 653
491% 657 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 177%
Great: 365%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
23GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 427
Mixed 345
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 42
141% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 323
250% 342 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
90GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 299 300 300 300 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 429
Mixed 381
SusWrite 315
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 44.4
144% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 346
260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 124%
WD My Passport 25EA 2TB
1TB free, PID 25ea
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 52.8
Write 33.6
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 35.5
48% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF ... 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 18.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAx Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Supermicro X10DAx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback