Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 210%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics172% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive498% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 15:58
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$310
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 88.4
1-Core 215
2-Core 427
127% 243 Pts
4-Core 854
8-Core 1,611
147% 1,233 Pts
64-Core 2,912
180% 2,912 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
PowerColor(148C 2406) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
172% Outstanding
Lighting 203
Reflection 240
Parallax 439
166% 294 fps
MRender 391
Gravity 164
Splatting 312
237% 289 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 172%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
634GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 457 468 490 490 489 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 487
Mixed 465
SusWrite 475
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 49.8
157% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 344
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
345GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2047 700 272 304 315 323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,704
Write 2,132
Mixed 1,728
SusWrite 660
350% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 92.9
307% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,593
DQ Write 1,477
DQ Mixed 1,220
1,002% 1,430 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 272%
Great: 295%
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
686GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4946 4274 2266 1595 1467 1498 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
498% Outstanding
Read 3,001
Write 4,780
Mixed 3,222
SusWrite 2,674
775% 3,419 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 269
4K Mixed 128
417% 157 MB/s
DQ Read 1,922
DQ Write 1875
DQ Mixed 1,948
1,450% 1915 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 498%
Great: 591%
GOODRAM 240GB
8GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 393
Mixed 319
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 33.9
125% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 167
163% 256 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
174GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 457 469 491 445 282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 461
SusWrite 433
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 49.1
162% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
54GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 115 114 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 117
Write 114
Mixed 79
SusWrite 113
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51
51GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 103 103 106 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 104
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 57.5
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 53.1
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 36.6
108% 37.6 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 147%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback