HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88EE
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 14:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 248
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 822
77% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,186
73% 1,186 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 88EE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.02.04
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 151
Parallax 29.6
18% 67.4 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 21.7
17% 19.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,616
Write 2,010
Mixed 1852
410% 1826 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 65.6
202% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 946
699% 924 MB/s
Poor: 239% Great: 591%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S1MF-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.4% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 21.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx Builds (Compare 2,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback