Lenovo 30FMCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 30FMCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1057
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 15:15
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 75.7
1-Core 208
2-Core 416
120% 233 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,496
139% 1,158 Pts
64-Core 2,671
165% 2,671 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Legend(17AA 1057) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
8.81% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 201
Parallax 11.4
8% 74.3 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.81%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL7 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,740
Write 3,383
Mixed 2,848
671% 2,990 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 98.6
344% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,534
DQ Write 1215
DQ Mixed 1,376
1,029% 1375 MB/s
Poor: 308% Great: 480%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 198
Write 122
Mixed 109
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 24R4GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 52.1
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 50.8
149% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 30.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 136%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30FMCTO1WW Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30FMCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback