Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6604JI
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '23 at 16:16
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 76.5
1-Core 218
2-Core 419
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 803
8-Core 1,352
131% 1,078 Pts
64-Core 2,791
173% 2,791 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1873) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.01
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 165
Parallax 200
136% 177 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 151
Splatting 109
133% 172 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 128%
Great: 152%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT2000P5 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,655
Write 4,077
Mixed 2,864
789% 3,532 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 95
309% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,101
DQ Write 809
DQ Mixed 926
700% 946 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 562%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
58GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 42
Mixed 7
48% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
41% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM 4800 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 62.9
MC Write 60
MC Mixed 58.5
173% 60.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 27.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 155%
Great: 155%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6604JI_K6604JI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback