Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

11 months ago, 11 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10110Y 40 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 34.2 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 70.7 29% 49.3 Pts	4-Core 84.8 8-Core 90 12% 87.4 Pts	64-Core 91.7 6% 91.7 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 218 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 86D0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.6% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 3.6 3% 3.23 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 0.1 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.6% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RBU-SNS8350DES3128GP 128GB 1,822 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: S4040105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 72 84 109 118 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 350 Write 206 Mixed 275 SusWrite 104 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 10.1 50% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 15.2 DQ Write 27.2 DQ Mixed 50.5 30% 31 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT6CL256M32AM-H0 2x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1.4 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-10110YIntelBench 48%, 40 samples	23x
Core i5-10210YIntelBench 57%, 115 samples	12x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 218 samples	35x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	8x
RBU-SNS8350DES3128GP 128GBBench 70%, 1,822 samples	7x
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples	5x

RAM
K4E6E304ED-EGCG 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 246 samples	24x
NT6CL512T32AM-H0 2x4GBNanyaBench 66%, 50 samples	7x
NT6CL256M32AM-H0 2x2GBNanyaBench 41%, 3 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16