Asrock H470 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H470 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '23 at 19:17
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 755
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 972
60% 972 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 47.1
30% 40.1 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 45.3
Splatting 37.5
36% 44.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1085 866 862 868 861 848 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,421
Write 2,245
Mixed 1,714
SusWrite 898
407% 1,820 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 77.2
258% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1008
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 895
659% 873 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 270%
Great: 355%
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
19GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 109 104 109 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 483
Write 107
Mixed 170
SusWrite 107
47% 217 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 17.5
100% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 40.9
50% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 65%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
846GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 56 58 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23% Poor
Read 23.2
Write 26.9
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 56.4
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23%
Great: 59%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
133GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 100 100 99 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 99.2
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
239GB free
Firmware: 0002YXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 118
Write 96.4
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 118
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 029E CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 8502 3200 C16 Series 029E CMT16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 21.1
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H470 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock H470 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $641
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback