HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 9470m  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 16:10
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3437U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 113
52% 84 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 159
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Exram 128GB 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 305 351 317 294 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 398
Write 318
Mixed 310
SusWrite 266
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 9.2
75% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 16.8
54% 114 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 158%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35
298GB free
Firmware: 0003LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 85 81 86 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 88.2
Write 59.6
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 83.3
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-073.A00LF Ramaxel RMT3020EF48E8W1333 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback