MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '23 at 17:01
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 269
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 882
82% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,479
92% 1,479 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 37.1
22% 28.4 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 22.5
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBI02102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 365 364 373 373 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 1,687
Mixed 1,370
SusWrite 376
311% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 40.6
182% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,157
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 760
643% 942 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 210%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 4133 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $903
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback