TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X556URK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X556URK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X556URK
Memory5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170207
Uptime11.4 Days
Run DateMay 29 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 110
49% 80 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 158
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 44.9%
 Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
Asus(1043 1490) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2225
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
7.26% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 10.9
9% 11.4 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 12
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.83 fps
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 7.26%
 Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 176 134 115 104 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 316
Write 231
Mixed 229
SusWrite 132
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 18.5
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 222
179% 252 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 54.2%
 Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 04CB 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 32.7%
 Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X556URK Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X556URK

CPU
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples276x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples259x
Core i7-7500U VHIntelBench 52%, 2,074 samples24x
GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples407x
930MXNvidiaBench 8%, 7,330 samples158x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples1x
SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples38x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples27x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples20x
RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples65x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GBHynixBench 52%, 1,703 samples30x
8ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 8GBMicronBench 62%, 307 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback