Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V222GA
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 04:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4005
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 44.6
1-Core 44.7
2-Core 45.1
30% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 69.6
9% 69.1 Pts
64-Core 53.5
3% 53.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1E80) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9077
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.3
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VR SATA3 256G 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HT3130A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 133 60 86 86 131 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 144
Write 182
Mixed 155
SusWrite 115
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 4.9
29% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 87
DQ Write 86.7
DQ Mixed 15.5
31% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-26 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.56% Terrible
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2.2
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivo AIO 22 V222GA_V222GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback