Today's hottest deals

Virtuozzo OpenStack Compute

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemVirtuozzo OpenStack Compute  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory23 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 08:19
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 57.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 396
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000P-6Q
Nvidia(10DE 13FD) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.2% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 43.1
33% 40.6 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 33.6
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 113 90 99 132 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 540
Write 130
Mixed 182
SusWrite 87.9
51% 235 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 11.1
40% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 33.8
37% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 451GB
18GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 42 44 42 72 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Virtuozzo 28GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 12288 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 71.3
167% 58.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 28.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 144%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback