ADD TO PC
BUILD

Virtuozzo OpenStack Compute

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

13 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Virtuozzo OpenStack Compute (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	23 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 30 '23 at 08:19
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC (with IBPB) 535 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 57.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 203 66% 121 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 396 53% 394 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GRID RTX6000P-6Q 15 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Nvidia(10DE 13FD) ≥ 4GB Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.98 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.2% Below average	Lighting 41 Reflection 37.8 Parallax 43.1 33% 40.6 fps	MRender 34.2 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 33.6 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 113 90 99 132 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 540 Write 130 Mixed 182 SusWrite 87.9 51% 235 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 11.1 40% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 18.7 DQ Mixed 33.8 37% 64.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 451GB 18GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 42 44 42 72 34 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Virtuozzo 28GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 12288 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	MC Read 50.5 MC Write 53.5 MC Mixed 71.3 167% 58.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 28.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback