Dell Precision 7820 Tower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision 7820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0804P1
Memory118.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 09:06
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6230R
CPU0, 1 CPU, 26 cores, 52 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 188
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 827
76% 633 Pts
64-Core 4,514
279% 4,514 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.6% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 80.9
64% 82.3 fps
MRender 84.1
Gravity 82.6
Splatting 90.4
71% 85.7 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 70%
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 121
Parallax 127
111% 128 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.2
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4G43AB3-CWE 4x31.8GB
4 of 12 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.2% Good
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 234%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 7820 Tower Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Dell Precision 7820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback