Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1720 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 01 '23 at 08:24
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 129
2-Core 239
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 648
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$222
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3620 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.5% Very good
Lighting 88.6
Reflection 125
Parallax 81.6
72% 98.4 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 74.1
Splatting 68.9
67% 84.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,391
Write 828
Mixed 903
230% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 65.1
240% 92.6 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 571
485% 702 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 190%
WD easystore 2647 2TB
0GB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 113 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 99.4
Write 108
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 112
134% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.7
312% 3.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 0.7
331% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback