Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 08 '17 at 18:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 213
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 699
68% 558 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 32.6
22% 28 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 31
Splatting 26.2
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Crucial_CT275MX3 275GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 447
Write 425
Mixed 429
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 24.5
85% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 55.1
74% 133 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78%
Great: 78%
Amd-raid Array 2 500GB
420GB free
Firmware: 8.1
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 52.1
Mixed 61.6
50% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.54
129% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 34.5
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback