Lenovo 3578CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3578CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 06:09
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 165
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 236
31% 235 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 123
Parallax 110
85% 112 fps
MRender 99.8
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.7
79% 97.6 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 102 90 101 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 134
Write 176
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 97.6
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 13.2
61% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 0.2
38% 92.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 166 187 178 191 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 134
Write 106
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 171
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 029E CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 12.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3578CTO Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3578CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback