Biostar H61MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MH  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110407
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 09:21
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 86.1
45% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 91
8-Core 88.3
12% 89.7 Pts
64-Core 86.1
5% 86.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Biostar(1565 110D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 66 14 69 38 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.1% Poor
Read 168
Write 79.3
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 52
20% 92 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 9.1
35% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 12
9% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 12GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MH Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback