Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 5049A1G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 5049A1G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120718
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 05 '23 at 15:59
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2130-$86
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 132
56% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 189
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 956 MHz, MLim: 513 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.93% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 10.9
6% 10.1 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 9.1
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.93%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 76 86 80 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 92.7
Write 89.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 81.2
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 60%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
74GB free
Firmware: 0005HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 35 34 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 65.8
Write 54.3
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 34.4
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-D8WM9 ST51264BA1339.16FM 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5049A1G Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 5049A1G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback