Gigabyte GA-H81M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S  (all builds)
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150819
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 06 '23 at 12:16
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 117
49% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 123
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.9
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EVM SSD 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 80 96 58 42 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 187
Write 163
Mixed 178
SusWrite 54.3
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 7.9
53% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 69.4
DQ Write 11.9
DQ Mixed 1
11% 27.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 28%
Great: 144%
BFDT50B2HC276354 500GB
291GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 54 78 91 85 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
Read 87.5
Write 80.1
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 80.8
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U67F9333G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 2.6
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S Builds (Compare 1,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback