Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507RE
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
70% 131 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 774
68% 575 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1EAC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.2% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 46.4
26% 38.3 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 49.4
30% 33.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 1164 401 137 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,546
Write 1,379
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 512
254% 1,135 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 53.8
183% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 408
369% 549 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 177%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507RE_FA507RE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback