Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	9.08% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Foxconn BLOODRAGE (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn BLOODRAGE
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090318
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '17 at 16:07
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 142 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 339 37% 295 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PQI MLC 128GB SSD 8 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.10104 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6150 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 100 0 (E5) Unknown 100 0 79681287477129 (E8) Unknown 100 48 9028846498104 (E9) Unknown 100 0 30406740993 (EA) Unknown 100 0 747743802648 (EB) Unknown 100 0 3087345789	9.08% Terrible	Read 145 Write 40.9 Mixed 60.1 18% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.007 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 1.37 2% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.08% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 6 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	4x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce 7900 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 538 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	1x

SSD
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	1x
Force 3 120GBCorsair $109Bench 48%, 22,358 samples	1x
SM841 2.5" 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 4,859 samples	1x

RAM
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	5x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16