Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 840r G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 840r G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8418
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 21:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 82.5
43% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 145
23% 166 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8418) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.6
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.3
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X600 M.2 2280 SATA 128GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6114012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 108 113 108 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 309
Write 192
Mixed 212
SusWrite 110
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 23.6
71% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 209
160% 218 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 82%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
462GB free
Firmware: AV0A2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 98 101 109 108 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 104
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840r G4 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840r G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback