Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 1,907 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 192 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 509 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.3% Poor	Lighting 30.2 Reflection 17.9 Parallax 30.2 25% 26.1 fps	MRender 23.1 Gravity 32.1 Splatting 21.9 21% 25.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 668GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 331 369 361 364 359 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 463 Write 424 Mixed 260 SusWrite 355 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 41.1 137% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.2 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 80.9 55% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 117%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 13GB free Firmware: MS1OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 87 84 85 84 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 108 Write 91.8 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 83.1 56% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 220GB free Firmware: MX4OAC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 110 114 110 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 131 Write 131 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 112 71% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G9E1 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63% Good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 20.4 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 19.1 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	759x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	383x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	224x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	148x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	132x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	188x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	180x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	162x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440