Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M200-A55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-A55  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M200-A55
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 91.2
41% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 144
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Elitegroup(1019 7C90) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 4.6
4% 5.53 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4
Splatting 6.9
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128GB 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 178 191 198 214 209 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 214
Write 171
Mixed 203
SusWrite 194
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 25.2
88% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 75.7
DQ Write 82.7
DQ Mixed 134
86% 97.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 91%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$99
171GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 89 87 87 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 81.8
Write 76.8
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 88
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CMA Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1866, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.2% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M200-A55 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-A55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback