Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 98 2-Core 178 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 483 50% 403 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 8427) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.24% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 5.4 5% 13.4 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 8.9 6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.24% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD70H1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,058 Write 902 Mixed 835 207% 932 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 46 142% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 572 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 445 338% 459 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 235%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M474A1K43BB1-CTD 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.5% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 20.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 17.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	406x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	268x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	71x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	151x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	98x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	79x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	120x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	101x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	51x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16