Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 17.2 1-Core 51.2 2-Core 88.7 27% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 210 24% 188 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8548) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 3.7 3% 3.73 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 6.5 5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB 20,750 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 191 171 195 300 386 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 332 Write 214 Mixed 243 SusWrite 241 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 9.2 30% 8.6 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 342 12% 342 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	167x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 6%, 127 samples	1x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	1x

SSD
MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GBCrucialBench 139%, 5,621 samples	19x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	17x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	14x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 7,471 samples	32x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 1x16GBMicronBench 44%, 6,417 samples	15x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 4,122 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16