Gigabyte GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z270-Phoenix Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '23 at 16:12
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 276
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 676
74% 586 Pts
64-Core 655
41% 655 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 251
Reflection 280
Parallax 292
204% 274 fps
MRender 344
Gravity 249
Splatting 186
204% 260 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 184%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 980 1284 604 608 609 605 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2289
Write 1,946
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 782
368% 1,649 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 75
235% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 975
731% 975 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 256%
Great: 296%
SSD 128GB 128GB
21GB free
Firmware: 0818
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 134 137 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 459
Write 140
Mixed 142
SusWrite 136
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 10.4
91% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 58.2
67% 116 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59%
Great: 93%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
46GB free
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 166 173 175 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 488
Write 174
Mixed 162
SusWrite 168
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 13.2
91% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 77.4
83% 138 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 71%
Tammuz SSD 1TB
257GB free
Firmware: 0200H311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 348 453 467 470 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 273
Write 108
Mixed 288
SusWrite 413
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 41.9
150% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 236
201% 292 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 231%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
117GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 86 88 86 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 66.8
Write 67.6
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 86.2
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 27.2
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 29.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270-Phoenix Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback